El Thursday 26 March 2015, Christian Brabandt escribió: > Am 2015-03-25 21:48, schrieb Bram Moolenaar: > > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> @Bram, perhaps it is necessary to split the runtime directory into a > >> separate > >> github repository, so they could be easier handled. > > > > How is that easier? Most users will want just one repo to pull from > > and > > rebuild their local Vim, possibly with some local changes.
The runtime directory could be a submodule inside the main repository. > Well, it could be co-maintained, taking burden from you to merge runtime > file changes, > or documentation updates and you could concentrate on the code. Yes, please. It would help to prevent that things like these happen again: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vim_dev/MszvcBd8p1Q Compare how this two have evolved: https://github.com/vim-jp/vim-cpp/commits/master/syntax/cpp.vim https://github.com/vim/vim/commits/master/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim I personally have not even thought of contributing to runtime files because of this "workflow". -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net
