Hi Carl! On Sa, 18 Apr 2015, Carl Jackson wrote:
> I'm curious if there's any interest in accepting the tagfunc patch (or > something similar in spirit) into vim: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/jWXPP2II0YA/lYw3j74snnwJ Current patch is here: https://github.com/chrisbra/vim-mq-patches/blob/master/tagfunc > My use-case is to make better use of modern static analysis tools: > many programming languages have very high quality tools that know > exactly where any given source symbol was defined, without having to > resort to precomputed ctags-like textual indexes. Unfortunately, these > tools are very difficult to integrate into vim, and most vim plugins > which add support for these tools cut corners and don't replicate any > of ctags' stack-like or tselect behavior, which makes for a pretty > terrible UX. > > I don't have strong opinions on the best way to tackle this problem, > but tagfunc seems like a very convenient solution (an alternative > might be a mechanism to programmatically push and pop entries from the > tag stack). Especially given that this patch has been floating around > for a while now, I'd be eager to see it included in vim proper. It would help, if you could apply the patch and report back how well it works. I think tests would also be nice. Best, Christian -- Ich weiß nicht, wer die Welt erschaffen hat, aber ich weiß, wer sie vernichtet. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
