> I usually use :imap instead of :inoremap, and then the abbreviation gets
> expanded. (I think you're aware of that and referred to it as
> "non-recursively mapped".) So far, I haven't had any problems with that;
> you only have to be careful now that the {rhs} gets remapped, and that
> can be controlled via subordinate :inoremap'ed <SID>IntermediateMappings
> (but not for the first inserted character).Thank you Ingo, I was not aware of that. How to expect that a non-recursive mapping to a key differs from the recursive mapping if the key is not remapped ? The issue was just about coherence; in my view this behavior goes against the user's expectations. Practically your remark solves all of my problems, subordinate :inoremap'ed <SID>IntermediateMappings are the way to go. Enno -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
