Luc Hermitte wrote:
> If I understand correctly, undo won't be broken as long as we move the
> cursor with <left>, <right>, and so on.
>
> Will it be possible to also support moves based on search() and
> searchpair() ?
That goes in the direction of merging two undo actions. That's
basically making "u" work like "2u"
What Christian's change allows for is also make redo work: ".".
That's quite difficult for not so simple commands.
--
FATHER: Did you kill all those guards?
LAUNCELOT: Yes ... I'm very sorry ...
FATHER: They cost fifty pounds each!
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
