Hi Christian,
On 2015-09-03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Gary!
>
> On Di, 01 Sep 2015, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Thanks for this change. I think it would work better and as I think
> > "zt" should if that line was uncommented.
> >
> > Even then, though, there is a bug in the behavior. It was in
> > Christian's original patch, too--I just didn't notice it until I
> > started testing this patch.
[...]
> I see the problem:
> diff --git a/src/move.c b/src/move.c
> --- a/src/move.c
> +++ b/src/move.c
> @@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ scroll_cursor_top(min_scroll, always)
> * TODO: if filler lines above new top are to be considered as context
> for
> * the current window, leave next statement commented, else hide filler
> * lines above cursor line, by adding them to extra */
> - /* extra += diff_check_fill(curwin, curwin->w_cursor.lnum); */
> + extra += diff_check_fill(curwin, curwin->w_cursor.lnum);
> #endif
>
> /*
> @@ -1771,7 +1771,7 @@ scroll_cursor_top(min_scroll, always)
> i = 1;
> else
> #endif
> - i = plines(top);
> + i = plines_nofill(top);
> used += i;
> if (extra + i <= off && bot < curbuf->b_ml.ml_line_count)
> {
Lovely! Thank you!
Regards,
Gary
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
