On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Alberto Fanjul <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is all implemented. Just a note about frame (there are collisions): > > - f issues file > - fi[nish] > - fr[ame] > > I wil change frame layout to mimic gdb in no time > When several ex-commands start the same, one of them always takes priority (usually the one with the highest antiquity), here are two examples with many such: :e[dit] :ea[rlier] :ec[ho] :echoe[rr] :echoh[l] :echom[sg] :echon :el[se] :elsei[f] :em[enu] :en[dif] :ene[w] :endf[unction] :endfo[r] :endt[ry] :endw[hile] :ex :exe[cute] :exi[t] :exu[sage] :f[ile] :fin[d] :fina[lly] :fini[sh] :fir[st] :fix[del] :files :filet[ype] :fo[ld] :for :foldc[lose] :foldd[oopen] :folddoc[losed] :foldo[pen] :files :fu[nction] …and in the case of :Next and :X (which start with an uppercase letter) the builtin command takes precedence over user-commands. So since :f or :fi always meant :file and :fin meant :find, you need to use at least :fini for :finish, and for compatibility reasons if a new :frame command is defined it should, at most, be abbreviated to :fr Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
