Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 22 Dez 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I think it's confusing that adding ! means something different for
> > :windo and :bufdo. A separate argument would be better.
> > That's more work, but I'm sure you can handle it :-).
>
> You mean like windo restoreview command?
Well, how do we add an argument to a command, in a way that it's simple
and consistent? Perhaps <restore> ? We don't have dashed arguments,
we do have <buffer> for :map. It's less likely to clash with a valid
argument at least. And we have arguments like <sfile>, <abuf>, etc.
--
PRINCE: He's come to rescue me, father.
LAUNCELOT: (embarrassed) Well, let's not jump to conclusions ...
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
