On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, James McCoy <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not suggesting it should be rebuilt as part of the normal build that > users perform. > > I'm suggesting that the CI infrastructure rebuilds it for a couple > reasons. > > 1. Make it easier for pull requests which modify configure.in to be > verified. > 2. Catch problems with newer autoconf versions automatically, as the CI > infrastructure updates. > > These seem like reasonable things to have the CI doing. > > Cheers,
Er, sorry, I think I've hit a vocabulary problem. What do you mean by CI? I tried to look it up on Wikipedia but even in the "Computing" section of that homonymy page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CI#Computing there are various different meanings listed, none of which seems to make obvious sense in the present context. Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
