On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 4:18:38 PM UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Now that the basic channel and job support is there, I would like to > invite plugin writers to give feedback. We probably need some more > features and/or change how things work. > > NeoVim is free to follow. It appears NeoVim's ideas about jobs and > channels are quite different. And it seems to be quite complicated.
neovim implementation is indeed quite different as it uses libuv, and this difference will probably remain. But what specifically about the interface (that neovim exposes to plugin developer) do you think is too complicated? vim and neovim will likely diverge to the exact features supported, but it would be nice if the shared base features had the same interface. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
