Takuya Fujiwara wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Now that we have some functions with a common prefix, it seems to work > > quite well. The older way of having read_xxx(), write_xxx(), > > check_xxx() makes functions scatter. xxx_read(), xxx_write() and > > xxx_check() looks better, easier to find what you are looking for. > > > > Anything against it? > > Hmm, to make sure, let me confirm that: > Are you changing older functions which do not have a common prefix? > > json*() and js*() functions are new, > but, for example, readfile() is not new. > There are many many plugins to use them. > We should change them now.
I will only change recently added functions. Renaming older functions will cause too much trouble. Adding aliases will not really improve the overal experience either. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 232. You start conversations with, "Have you gotten an ISDN line?" /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
