Christian J. Robinson wrote:
> After this patch, sending an eval channel command never gets a return
> message. I don't get an error either. Has the syntax changed? The
> documentation isn't updated.
Sorry, documentation update will follow later.
As the note mentions, "expr" and "eval" have been merged. Just use
"expr" with a number to get what "eval" did before:
Possible commands are:
["redraw" {forced}]
["ex", {Ex command}]
["normal", {Normal mode command}]
["expr", {expression}, {number}]
["expr", {expression}]
["call", {func name}, {argument list}, {number}]
["call", {func name}, {argument list}]
Both "expr" and "call" will send a response when the {number} argument
is there. That seemed better than having four commands, two of which
would fail when the {number} argument is missing.
--
GUARD #2: Wait a minute -- supposing two swallows carried it together?
GUARD #1: No, they'd have to have it on a line.
GUARD #2: Well, simple! They'd just use a standard creeper!
GUARD #1: What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
GUARD #2: Well, why not?
The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
