That's right :) Thank you for the supplementary comment. And...
namsh, I'm reluctant to say this to you indeed, but I'd like to revert the patch to the first one. The reason is that the first patch is expected to work better for the default settings and thus seemingly more beneficial to many others. So I know it's very troublesome for you to change your settings again and again in hours, I wish you would accept my proposal -- inclusion of the first patch, not the second one. Is it OK for you? - Kazunobu 2016-03-10 14:46 GMT+09:00 SungHyun Nam <gow...@gmail.com>: > 2016-03-10 오후 2:37에 SungHyun Nam 이(가) 쓴 글: > > 2016-03-10 오후 2:17에 Kazunobu Kuriyama 이(가) 쓴 글: > >> Then, could you try this one, please? > >> > >> When you see the gtk2 color inversion carefully (in particular, the dots > >> along the color boundary), you'll find it's not really an inversion). > >> > >> Does this gtk3 patch improve that? > > > > Yes, now the selection color is clean with a same setting. > > > > Without this patch, I tried to tweak the 'Normal' highlight setting. > > I used below setting with gtk2vim. > > hi Normal gui=NONE guifg=#444444 guibg=#fffefe > > If I change the 'guifg' to #101010, gtk3vim's selection is clean also. > > Because I noticed background color for gtk2vim and gtk3vim is > > different with a same syntax setting, I'm trying to check the gtk > > theme. Now I decide I will live with this patch without further > > investigating. > > Note that this patch improves other situation also. > > Today I noticed that if I selects a string in VIM window, the > selection color is different between normal mode and command line > mode. > > With this patch, the selection is clean for both normal and cmdline mode. > In my environment, gtk2vim's selection color is bad with cmdline > mode. > > > Thanks for your super-fast suport. > > namsh > > > >> 2016-03-10 14:05 GMT+09:00 SungHyun Nam <gow...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:gow...@gmail.com>>: > >> > >> 2016-03-10 오후 12:58에 Kazunobu Kuriyama 이(가) 쓴 글: > >> > Judging from the dates of the tar balls in the official repos, > >> > gtk+-3.0.0 was released on 2011-02-10 and cairo-1.10.0 (perhaps, a > >> > release version corresponding to the develop version 1.9.2) on > 2010-09-06. > >> > > >> > It looks we can safely assume that cairo >= 1.9.2 holds true for > systems > >> > where gtk+3 is installed. > >> > > >> > With this understanding, I propose the attached patch to fix the > issue > >> > above. > >> > > >> > namsh, could you confirm if the patch works for you? > >> > >> I confirmed that the selection problem is solved with this patch. > >> > >> I notice selection color is different between gtk2vim and gtk3vim. > >> But it seems it's related to my local settings. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> namsh > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
