Hi Bram,

2016/3/29 Tue 3:11:03 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ken Takata wrote:
> 
> > 2016/2/1 Mon 22:34:43 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > I think that all the style changes have completed.
> > > Here are the updated large file patches for 7.4.1229.
> > 
> > I have updated the large file patches for 7.4.1665.
> > Please check the attached five patches.
> > 
> > Bram, I'm afraid that you are mistaking some of my patches.
> > Attached patches are related to the following items from the todo.txt:
> > 
> > L170-173
> > > Win32: patch to use 64 bit stat() if possible. (Ken Takata, 2014 May 12)
> > > More tests May 14. Update May 29.  Update Aug 10.
> > > Now part of large file patches. (Ken Takata, 2016 Feb 1)
> > > Two patches now?  New update Feb 24.
> > 
> > L1929-1931
> > > Win64: Seek error in swap file for a very big file (3 Gbyte).  Check 
> > > storing
> > > pointer in long and seek offset in 64 bit var.
> > > Patches from Ken Takata might help (2014 Apr 17)
> > 
> > 
> > The large file patches are also available from the following URLs:
> > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/tip/0001_support-largefiles-on-windows.patch
> > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/tip/0002_fix-off_T-display.patch
> > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/tip/0003_use-stat_T.patch
> > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/tip/0004_add-stat-test.patch
> > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/tip/0005_test_largefile.patch
> > (I will keep them up to date in the same URLs.)
> 
> So those patches are supposed to be included in order and sent out as
> separate patches?  Or could I just include all of these and send out one
> big patch?

I separate them mainly for readability.  They can be merged as one patch.

More detail:

* 0001: This is a core part of them. This should fix the reported two problems:
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/8epHlRuIAHc/discussion
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_use/RLM8Vqa_aME/discussion
* 0002: Only fixes one display problem. This can be considered as a part of
        0001.
* 0003: This fixes another problem: 32-bit stat() returns an error for a file
        larger than 4 GiB. :checktime, getfperm() or other stat functions
        might fail for large files.
* 0004: Adds basic tests for stat functions. This can be considered as a part
        of 0003.
* 0005: Adds tests for 0001 and 0003. This is not added as a normal test
        target.  A special target would be needed as you said:
          > For the test, we can add a "torture" target. 


> > I think these patches are rather important, as some people reported that 
> > very
> > large file can be truncated or Vim can crash:
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/8epHlRuIAHc/discussion
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_use/RLM8Vqa_aME/discussion
> > 
> > Note: these patches doesn't fix some display problems (e.g. g<C-G>) because
> > 64-bit integers are needed. To fix them, the num64 patch is needed.
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/p8Fl_vJDGy8/discussion
> > (Additionally, the 0002_fix-off_T-display.patch can be simpler when the 
> > num64
> > patch is included.)
> 
> I hope to get back to including patches soon.  Just a bit more cleanup
> for new features to do.

Regards,
Ken Takata

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui