Ozaki Kiichi wrote:
> Thank you for importing my patch.
>
> BTW, I think that it is a better that the position of the return value
> {idx} is on the end than 2nd ([str, start, end, idx]), when 1st arg is
> list. There will be a better consistency with the case 1st arg is
> string.
>
> https://gist.github.com/ichizok/176e7a759a12f87255fd9aaf3134e516
>
> What are your thoughts on this?
Yeah, this is a draw between putting the more important value first
(index in the list) and consistency between results (putting start and
end position in postion 2 and 3 always).
For when using it I suppose doesn't matter much. Perhaps it's a bit
easier to explain/understand when the list index comes last.
--
"The question of whether computers can think is just like the question
of whether submarines can swim." -- Edsger W. Dijkstra
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
