2016-05-21 23:50 GMT+03:00 Nikolai Aleksandrovich Pavlov <[email protected]>: > > > Is there another way to call self.callback() (from my last example) such as > > to ensure that whatever I previously saved to obj2.callback has not been > > altered, and call self.callback() would in fact resolve to func1() with > > self linked to obj1 instead of obj2 as it happens now? > > That was in the very first message: use get().
Very first my message. > > > If it does then why (when I later call self.callback() which (in theory) > > should invoke obj1.func1 bound to obj1) I get test=test2 instead of > > test=test1 ? > > That was explained in my messages. A few times, if I am not mistaking. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
