Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> 2016-05-24 19:37 GMT+03:00 Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Patch 7.4.1839
> > Problem: Cannot get the items stored in a partial.
> > Solution: Support using get() on a partial.
> > Files: src/eval.c, src/testdir/test_partial.vim, runtime/doc/eval.tx=
[...]
> > + {what} are:
> > + 'func' The function
>
> This should be “the function name” I think. When reading “the
> function” I expect returning funcref. Maybe even this is what should
> actually be returned (I would expect something like “name” key to
> return the function name, “func” sounds like returning a funcref as
> well):
Yeah, when writing this I was also wondering whether to return the name
or something else. Returning both is the most flexible.
I don't think "subtype" makes sense. This difference is only used
internally, the help only talks about Funcref, of which partial is a
form where args or dict is bound. get() already indicates a Funcref is
like a Partial without arguments or dict.
--
You have heard the saying that if you put a thousand monkeys in a room with a
thousand typewriters and waited long enough, eventually you would have a room
full of dead monkeys.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
