I wrote:
> Ramel Eshed wrote:
>
> > > > 1) Actually, there is a bug here which is not exactly what I've
> > > > described earlier. The issue is that :call setqflist([]), instead of
> > > > adding one more list after the last list, will clear the next list and
> > > > delete the ones after. For example: let's say I used :grep 4 times so
> > > > I have now 4 lists. Now, if I do :colder 3, the first list becomes the
> > > > current list. :call setqflist([]) will empty list 2, and delete lists
> > > > 3 and 4.
> > >
> > > We do remove newer lists when adding a new list before the end, but in
> > > this case it should not happen.
> > I'm not sure I understand. Is removing all the newer lists are the
> > expected behavior? why? and why is it different here?
>
> Removing newer lists is what happens when inserting a list. But you are
> not inserting here, you are clearing it.
Somehow I managed to read that you were using:
call setqflist([], 'r')
Which clears the list. But it appears you were doing:
call setqflist([])
Which appends a new list. Then all following (newer) lists are deleted.
That's how it is supposed to work.
--
ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
