On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 1:35:22 AM UTC+9, Manuel Ortega wrote: > I don't have positive suggestion for an alternative, but... > > > Please, please don't name the new function "execute()". It only breeds > confusion because there is already a command called "execute". It really > sucks when this happens, like with substitute() and :substitute. New users > get confused, because ":H substitute" takes one to the docs for the function, > when they are looking for how to use the command. And there are differences > between the function and the command that become confusing when they have the > same name (like which flags are allowed). Now with "execute", the command > will let you do a :redir inside it, but the function won't.
call and call() are also. But I don't think it makes confusing. - mattn -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
