On Saturday, June 14, 2014 at 11:51:59 AM UTC-4, Justin M. Keyes wrote: > With shelltemp=0, Vim automatically falls back to using temp files if > pipes don't work. So why isn't shelltemp=0 the default? > > If I understand correctly, 'shelltemp' affects: > > :! > :w !foo > :r !foo > > But it does _not_ affect system(). Is that because it just hasn't been > implemented for system(), or is it a design decision? system() often > has temp file permissions issues on Windows[1][2][3][4], so using > pipes could make system() more reliable. > > Another question. :help 'shelltemp' says: > > The advantage of using a temp file is that the file type and encoding > can be detected. > The FilterReadPre, FilterReadPost and FilterWritePre, > FilterWritePost autocommands event are not triggered when > 'shelltemp' is off. > > Is there a technical reason this can't be done? > > Thanks! > > [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/vim_use/JSXaM9YjWKo/HtHn36WFb_kJ > [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/vim_use/adD_-9yBCEU/Y0ul-OwXGpYJ > [3] https://github.com/mattn/gist-vim/issues/48#issuecomment-12916349 > [4] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/vim_use/oU7y-hmQoNc/2qQnkPl6aKkJ > > Justin M. Keyes
I would very much like to know the answer to the OP's question, since I would like the ability to force system() to obey &noshelltemp. -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
