On Mi, 27 Jul 2016, LCD 47 wrote:
> After pondering about this for a while, I believe the stack pointer
> is the only one that needs a value in both getqflist() and setqflist(),
> so you could in principle encode it as simply a number. That is, a
> number in the list would refer to the stack pointer, as opposed to the
> other names that would be alphabetic. But that would be even worse than
> having a dict with dummy values. So yes, this is probably a good reason
> for using dicts.
Can't we use an extra optional argument for the stack pointer? If not
given, it would always use the current list.
Best,
Christian
--
Aufhören können, das ist nicht eine Schwäche, das ist eine Stärke.
Die Geschichte lehrt dauernd, aber sie findet keine Schüler.
-- Ingeborg Bachmann
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
