On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 2:26:55 AM UTC-5, Rob Foehl wrote: > > Since the behavior of 'preserveindent' is already dependent on > 'expandtab', would you or anyone else be opposed to changing the 'noet' > case to avoid alternating tabs and spaces? Oversimplifying a bit, and > particularly glossing over 'shiftwidth' and the actual modification point, > the effective behavior would be: > > 'pi et': preferentially adjust spaces after tabs > 'pi noet': preferentially adjust tabs before spaces > > This looks doable, although I haven't tried anything yet... Thoughts? > > -Rob
Probably that would work OK. The devil is in the details, of course. :-) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
