Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> > ***************
> > *** 5131,5136 ****
> > --- 5132,5143 ----
> > dict_add_nr_str(dict, "width", wp->w_width, NULL);
> > dict_add_nr_str(dict, "bufnum", wp->w_buffer->b_fnum, NULL);
> >
> > + #ifdef FEAT_QUICKFIX
>
> This part is not reflected in documentation: if `!has('quickfix')`
> relevant entries are missing, otherwise they are always present. It
> should either always create these numbers (set to zero if
> FEAT_QUICKFIX is not defined) or documentation should explicitly say
> that these keys will be missing in case of `!has('quickfix')`.
I'll add a remark. There might be more like this.
> I am also not sure whether or not this is needed, but tests do not
> check for `has('quickfix')`.
Well, the test only runs with the +eval feature, which is when normal
features are enabled, and then quickfix is also enabled. So it would
only fail when someone explicitly disables quickfix.
--
How To Keep A Healthy Level Of Insanity:
6. In the memo field of all your checks, write "for sexual favors".
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
