Hi Bram! On Mo, 29 Aug 2016, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > I am currently writing some tests for normal.c, to increase the coverage. > > > > Unfortunately, I noteiced some bugs with folding: Here is one issue: > > > > ~$ vim -u NONE -N > > call setline(1, range(1,10) > > :3 > > norm! 2zF > > :2 > > norm! 5zF > > :set nofoldenable > > :3 > > norm! zc -> folds line 2 - 8, I would have expected to only close the > > inner fold 3-4, but perhaps that is expected, but see below: > > set nofoldenable > > norm! Vzc -> correctly folds 3-4 > > :set nofoldenable > > norm! zc -> folds lines 3-4? > > Isn't this because 'foldlevel' keeps the same value when 'foldenable' is > reset? But I never messed with the foldlevel setting. Also, it seems, it is not so easily reproducible, as I initially thought. Sometimes it happens for me, and sometimes it always folds lines 2-8 but I never saw that it changes the foldlevel setting > > Also I got another session, where zF create one additional closing > > fold marker several lines below where it definitly shouldn't. > > Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this problem anymore. > > The rules for opening a closing folds are a bit complicated... > It's possible there is a bug, but it's also possible that something is > missing in the documentation. I notice "zc" doesn't say anything about > 'foldlevel'. Adding to the documentation does help, as I only test according to the documentation and do not read the source. Hm, will have to further investigate. Best, Christian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
