On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+9, mattn wrote: > On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 5:49:32 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Thanks for diving into this. But I think this needs more testing, since > > it's quite different from what we have before. > > > > I think the "escaping" value needs to be reset after > > for (i = 0; i < escaping; i++) > > Looks like you get there with a sequence \"" > > No, \n"" should be \\n\"\". i.e. second double-quote should be \". I'll add > test in later.
Updated patch. Added few tests. https://gist.github.com/mattn/d47e7d3bfe5ade4be86062b565a4bfca -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.