On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+9, mattn wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 5:49:32 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Thanks for diving into this.  But I think this needs more testing, since
> > it's quite different from what we have before.
> > 
> > I think the "escaping" value needs to be reset after
> >       for (i = 0; i < escaping; i++)
> > Looks like you get there with a sequence \""
> 
> No, \n"" should be \\n\"\". i.e. second double-quote should be \". I'll add 
> test in later.

Updated patch. Added few tests.

https://gist.github.com/mattn/d47e7d3bfe5ade4be86062b565a4bfca

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui