Lcd wrote:

> On 8 October 2016, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Lcd wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 7 October 2016, Gerd Wachsmuth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > The issue is that the multiline error is started by %W and ends with 
> > > > > %Z without adding any errors.
> > > > In my opinion, it is not the issue that no `%C` is present:
> > > > With
> > > > 
> > > >     set efm=%+Eerror\ %l,%-Winfo\ %m\ %l,%+Ceven\ more\ %m,%Zmore\ info
> > > > (note the `%C` line)
> > > > and the errorfile
> > > > ````
> > > > info bla 3
> > > > even more info
> > > > more info
> > > > error 2
> > > > ````
> > > > we do not see `error 2` in the quickfix window.
> > > 
> > >     What seems to be going on here is that the first line gets matched
> > > as `%-W` and `qf_parse_line()` returns `QF_IGNORE_LINE`.  Then the
> > > second line gets matched as `%+C`, it sets `%m`, but then it can't
> > > find a previous line to continue since the previous line was ignored.
> > > Consequently `qf_parse_line()` returns `QF_FAIL`, and `qf_init_ext()`
> > > bails out at that point, silently ignoring any remaining input.
> > > 
> > >     Possible solution:
> > > 
> > > ```diff
> > > diff --git a/src/quickfix.c b/src/quickfix.c
> > > index 52abbeb..9139663 100644
> > > --- a/src/quickfix.c
> > > +++ b/src/quickfix.c
> > > @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ restofline:
> > >   }
> > >   else if (vim_strchr((char_u *)"CZ", idx) != NULL)
> > >   {                               /* continuation of multi-line msg */
> > > +     if (!qi->qf_multiignore)
> > > +     {
> > >           qfline_T *qfprev = qi->qf_lists[qi->qf_curlist].qf_last;
> > >  
> > >           if (qfprev == NULL)
> > > @@ -1043,6 +1045,7 @@ restofline:
> > >                       ? fields->namebuf
> > >                       : qi->qf_currfile != NULL && fields->valid
> > >                       ? qi->qf_currfile : 0);
> > > +     }
> > >       if (idx == 'Z')
> > >           qi->qf_multiline = qi->qf_multiignore = FALSE;
> > >       line_breakcheck();
> > > ```
> > 
> > Could you write a test that covers this?
> 
>     Done:
> 
>       https://gist.github.com/lcd047/4d4adb7e77fe29d9a8313c27fd42db25
> 
> (the diff is a lot bigger because of re-indentation).

Thanks.  I find it a bit hard to describe the problem and the fix.
Well, let's just keep it high level.

-- 
TALL KNIGHT: When you have found the shrubbery, then you must cut down the
             mightiest tree in the forest ... with a herring.
                 "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui