Bram Moolenaar wrote： > > This will not break the plugins, and will make ch_read better. > > It could be used in a timer for congestion control manually. > > That changes what you get back, that is a bit strange. > How about adding a function that returns whether there is something to > read? Could call it ch_canread(). >
I think "ch_canread()" is a nice design ! -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
