> Using the magic numbers is hard to understand. New options are probably > better done with string values, such as "on", "off", and empty for not > set. Perhaps in this case "number", "line" and "both"? But then naming > it 'cursorlineopt' would be better.
I have tried making out 'cursorlineopt' patch. https://gist.github.com/ichizok/691aa7e848afd4aa8229c7a51aec895b And test (also requires https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vim_dev/tzNKP7EDWYI). https://gist.github.com/ichizok/698abaef579911ec5157ba2be138739c Thank you. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
