Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> I noticed that part of neovim PR #6221 has been included in patch 88d298aed.
> Recently some off-by-one errors have been fixed in that PR, so I'm
> sending a patch testing for them and fixing them.
>
> Also, I noticed that the test that :move should not close folds in
> 'Test_move_folds_around_indent()' doesn't look at the case where folds
> are open because the user opened them with :foldopen or with zo, instead
> it checks for folds being open because of the value of 'foldlevel' (by
> using zR).
> As folds opened because of the 'foldlevel' setting haven't been getting
> closed after :move, but in recent versions of vim folds opened from zo
> or :foldopen have been closing after :move, the patch attached changes
> this test to look for folds opened because of :foldopen, and includes
> the change to pass this test.
Thanks!
The change to ex_cmds.c was already included.
I wonder if this also fixes the strange test failure on MS-Windows...
Looks like it does, nice. We can keep resetting 'shiftwidth', that's
better anyway.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
133. You communicate with people on other continents more than you
do with your own neighbors.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
