On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jacob Hayes <[email protected]> wrote: > @ R0b0t1: > Could you elaborate a bit more on supporting arbitrary signals? With > autocmds, each signal would have to have it's own status variable, event and > signal handler. Otherwise, it would not be possible to have separate > handlers for different signals. >
Having the code be extensible. There's no sense in adding signals (preemptively) that aren't useful to you, but I would hope the pattern is easy to copy for new additions. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
