Le dimanche 11 février 2018 00:49:31 UTC+1, Ni Va a écrit : > Le dimanche 11 février 2018 00:40:23 UTC+1, ZyX a écrit : > > 2018-02-11 1:58 GMT+03:00 Ni Va <[email protected]>: > > > Le samedi 10 février 2018 21:17:16 UTC+1, Tony Mechelynck a écrit : > > >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:29 PM, 'Andy Wokula' via vim_use > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Am 10.02.2018 um 17:40 schrieb Ni Va: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi, > > >> >> > > >> >> Like :h ruby says, I use this kind of script ruby interface below. > > >> >> > > >> >> How can i make vim switch automatically to ruby syntax in EOF section > > >> >> and > > >> >> rest of time stay in vim syntax ? > > >> >> Thank you > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Example Vim script: > > > >> >> > > >> >> function! RedGem() > > >> >> ruby << EOF > > >> >> class Garnet > > >> >> def initialize(s) > > >> >> @buffer = Vim::Buffer.current > > >> >> vimputs(s) > > >> >> end > > >> >> def vimputs(s) > > >> >> @buffer.append(@buffer.count,s) > > >> >> end > > >> >> end > > >> >> gem = Garnet.new("pretty") > > >> >> EOF > > >> >> endfunction > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Configurable: > > >> > :h ft-vim-syntax > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Andy > > >> > > >> Under :h g:vimsyn_embed it says: «By default, g:vimsyn_embed is a > > >> string supporting interpreters that your vim itself supports.» > > >> However, my gvim is compiled with +lua -mzscheme +perl +python > > >> -python3 +ruby +tcl, and I don't set that variable in my vimrc (or > > >> anywhere else AFAIK), yet it is set to 'lmpPr' as if I had compiled > > >> with +mzscheme -tcl. How come? > > >> > > >> N.B. The same value is set if I run "view -u > > >> /usr/local/share/vim/vim80/vimrc_example.vim ~/.vimrc" i.e. _viewing_ > > >> my vimrc (so that the vim ftplugin gets sourced) but not _sourcing_ > > >> it. > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Tony. > > > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > My version has all supports lua/python/ruby but meanwhile setting let > > > g:vimsyn_embed = 'r' in _vimrc it appears that not working because of > > > s:rubypath undefined as is in vim80/syntax.vim: > > > > > > let s:rubypath= fnameescape(expand("<sfile>:p:h")."/ruby.vim") > > > if !filereadable(s:rubypath) > > > for s:rubypath in split(globpath(&rtp,"syntax/ruby.vim"),"\n") > > > if filereadable(fnameescape(s:rubypath)) > > > let s:rubypath= fnameescape(s:rubypath) > > > break > > > endif > > > endfor > > > endif > > > if (g:vimsyn_embed =~# 'r' && has("ruby")) && filereadable(s:rubypath) > > > > Though wondering why syntax script has `&& has('ruby')` (still, I > > remember complaining about that earlier) and `&& filereadable(…)` > > nonsense: it will color valid commands as errors if there is no ruby > > support set up (and \*.vim file may be intended for other then current > > Vim versions) or if ruby syntax file is not present (and inability to > > find syntax file does not mean that marking code in heredoc section as > > *error* and not just Normal text is a good idea). This is in addition > > to making Vim in some cases try finding and loading libraries even if > > user explicitly expressed by an option that he does need some embedded > > syntax and having workaround for hanging `has('tcl')` (a good hint to > > not actually do this at all). > > > > BTW, documentation does *not* say that embedded syntax will be > > supported only if corresponding interpreters are supported, but it > > does say that by default g:vimsyn_embed is set to a string supporting > > interpreters which Vim supports (actually, it is set to a string > > supporting interpreters syntax file supports minus tcl for some > > reason). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expand("<sfile>:p:h") <<< returns nothing. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > > > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > > > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > > > > > --- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "vim_dev" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > > email to [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > Yess my vim version is 'standalone', aims to be free from interpreters so I > use rubydll pythondll pythonhome etc.. just bring to my distro ruby..dll, > python27-37.dll into rtp. and all print..lua/ruby/python work. > > So in this configuration I don't need ruby interpreter and then s:rubypath > fails/ is void. > > So embed syntax between ruby <<< EOF.... EOF is broken that's it ? Nota : yes understood for sfile..
-- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
