Hi,
On 05/02/2018 11:13 PM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 02 Mai 2018, Erik Auerswald wrote:
I'll look into this. I haven't used vim scripting yet, and the test seems to
use it, thus I have to ask for a bit of patience.
It is not that hard. The file simply provides some input to xxd and
compares the actual result with some expected values. Take test 5 as an
example, it is pretty self explanatory.
Yes, this does not look too complicated.
I would like to add tests verifying the current behavior with regard to
-c does not change, including error messages, except for xxd -ps -c0. My
patch does change this (found this out with manual testing), thus I'd
suggest you disregard the patch for now.
There is quite a bit of xxd functionality not tested at all. I might
work on that as well.
Thanks,
Erik
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
