Christian wrote: > this patch fixes a problem with the gn command. This behaviour has been > noticed on https://vi.stackexchange.com/q/16276/71 > > It might happen, that the area being matched by the gn command is > actually not correct, because of the last search wrapping around and > matching at a previous match. Therefore, make sure to reset wrapscan > later and also check the return value of the last searchit() function. > If the last searchit() fails, try again from the position of the last > match before failing. > > Patch contains a test, that currently fails.
Thanks. I think the comment for "first_match" was wrong, I'll correct that. -- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
