Hi Bram, 2018/10/19 Fri 6:46:44 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Ken Takata wrote: > > You also included Michael's patch (only part of MinGW). > > Is it intentional? > > Sometimes I think it's not worth sending out a small change immediately, > and it gets picked up with the next change to the same file.
Hmm, I don't think this is the case. Michael's patch has also MSVC part. Merging only MinGW part this time and another part at another time causes confusion. (I think that the makefile for unix also needs similar change for ctags, though.) Regards, Ken Takata -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
