Christian wrote:
> Okay, how about this patch: Thanks. It would be helpful to add a few comments. E.g., why is the buffer size sufficient? I suppose because home_replace() can only make it shorter (is that actually true?). And splitting it in parts with += is probably needed to avoid running into MAXPATHL when reading back the option value, right? -- Facepalm statement #2: "If there is a country without immigrants I'm going to move there" /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
