Jason Franklin wrote:

> I noticed this week that Ctrl-^ and Ctrl-W-Ctrl-^ are not consistent in their
> behavior when the alternate file is not named.  The former works as expected,
> and the latter fails.  This was a tad annoying.
> 
> Example:
> vim --clean
> :e Xfoo
> :enew
> <C-^><C-^><C-^> " works fine
> <C-W><C-^> " fails to split window on other buffer
> 
> With this patch, <C-W><C-^> will work just like <C-^> but it will split
> a window first (with some sanity/error checking before it does so).
> 
> I also included MANY test cases.  Before these patches, these commands
> weren't tested very well at all.

Thanks!  I have to admit I don't use CTRL-^ much because it's not so
easy to type.

I should really find a way to avoid the need for "func!" in tests...

-- 
WOMAN:   King of the who?
ARTHUR:  The Britons.
WOMAN:   Who are the Britons?
ARTHUR:  Well, we all are. we're all Britons and I am your king.
                                  The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui