Hi, On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:06 AM Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegapp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:15 AM Jason Franklin > <jrfrank...@georgiasouthern.edu> wrote: > > > > Yegappan, > > > > Thanks for the patch. I didn't try the code, but I looked at the diff. > > > > It strikes me as odd that a new, empty buffer will need to be created at > > all. Why waste a buffer number? It seems like there should be a more > > clean solution in which the target buffer is opened in a split view > > directly without discarding an empty buffer in between. > > > > I was trying to address the removal of the temporary buffer without > significantly changing the functionality. > > > > > It seems to me like this is hiding the underlying problem, rather than > > fixing it. > > > > Maybe I'm being a little to picky? Let me know what you think... > > > > I will take a look to see how this can be achieved. >
The attached patch fixes this problem. While fixing this issue, I noticed that pressing CTRL-W-Enter key in a location list window opened by running the ":lhelpgrep" command doesn't open a new window. The attached patch fixes this issue also. - Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
qfsplit_v3.diff
Description: Binary data
