On 2019-04-24, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > I just realized that adding an upper-cased variant for z? to add a > > rare word to the internal word list will be impossible. Are we okay > > with that? > > > > I think that would be fine, but just checking. > > You are right, that restricts the usage. I think we should try hard to > make this consistent. > > We could use z/ and z?, on a US keyboard ? is the shifted character of > /. But it's hard to see the relation with "rare". > > There are not many "z" letter commands still available: > zp > zq > zu > zy > > Perhaps zq/zQ could be used, as I can't think of any other use for them. > It's a bit dangerous though, since ZQ is equivalent to ":q!", drops all > changes. Perhaps a warning would be sufficient? Or the user could map > ZQ to zQ to avoid trouble, if he never uses ZQ now.
Using zQ when a slip of the shift-key finger could easily change it to ZQ with disastrous results seems like a bad idea. A warning would be annoying, especially since one presumably would use ZQ instead of :q! to avoid keystrokes. How about zu/zU for z-uncommon? Regards, Gary -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
