> Understood. One relatively easy way to handle this is to handle the changes > in reverse, i.e. by iterating through the list backwards. But I think this > requires that the changes themselves be non-overlapping.
I actually misunderstood what you said here, so please ignore the question :) Now that I've actually given this a bit of a test I'm clear now. Apologies for the noise. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CACoUkn7cS_OY842Ofk%3DPXKFWyN3hrCm6rog0aDYNGzGPta5myw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
