On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:46 PM Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mi, 18 Sep 2019, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Let's be practical: We fixed something because a user complained and it > > was clear it had to be fixed. For "x" deleting a line we did not get > > complaints. And, depending on how you look at it, if "l" crosses line > > boundaries, it makes sense that "x" does too. Think of editing a > > paragraph with wrapped lines, then repeating "x" should not get stuck > > when the line gets empty. > > okay fine. I am still worried, that we are possibly deleting a line > content, that is not wanted (e.g. when virtualedit is active and the > cursor is on a NUL). > > So perhaps it would be better that 'x' in that case works like 'gJ' > (which does effectively only delete the line break). > > And for consistency, we should to translate X to either 'dd' or "-gJ" > when 'h' is in whichwrap, right? > > Best, > Christian
When the cursor is on an end-of-line (even without 'list', which I use) I would expect that x, or dl, would join the current line with the next one. Not that it'd be a no-op. Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAJkCKXtvO_3O2j8aWiM869kk16GnRm47EiSrc%3DK1R_cScnL2qA%40mail.gmail.com.
