Dominique wrote:
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > building v8.2.0460 gives the following test failures an amd64: > > > > Failures: > > From test_excmd.vim: > > Found errors in Test_confirm_cmd_cancel(): > > Run 1: > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_confirm_cmd_cancel[18]..StopVimIn= > Terminal[10]..WaitForAssert[2]..<SNR>7_WaitForCommon[11]..<lambda>16 line 1= > : Expected 'finished' but got 'running' > > Run 2: > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_confirm_cmd_cancel[18]..StopVimIn= > Terminal[10]..WaitForAssert[2]..<SNR>7_WaitForCommon[11]..<lambda>20 line 1= > : Expected 'finished' but got 'running' > > Run 3: > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_confirm_cmd_cancel[18]..StopVimIn= > Terminal[10]..WaitForAssert[2]..<SNR>7_WaitForCommon[11]..<lambda>24 line 1= > : Expected 'finished' but got 'running' > > Run 4: > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_confirm_cmd_cancel[18]..StopVimIn= > Terminal[10]..WaitForAssert[2]..<SNR>7_WaitForCommon[11]..<lambda>28 line 1= > : Expected 'finished' but got 'running' > > Run 5: > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_confirm_cmd_cancel[18]..StopVimIn= > Terminal[10]..WaitForAssert[2]..<SNR>7_WaitForCommon[11]..<lambda>32 line 1= > : Expected 'finished' but got 'running' > > Flaky test failed too often, giving up > > From test_alot.vim: > > Found errors in Test_compiler(): > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_compiler line 23: command did not= > fail: clist > > function RunTheTest[40]..Test_compiler line 29: Pattern '\\n \\= > d\\+ Xfoo.pl:3: Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name' does n= > ot match '\n21 Xfoo.pl:3: Global symbol "$foo" requires expl:3: Global symb= > ol "$foo" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $fo= > o"?)' > > I see the same failure in Test_confirm_cmd_cancel() > on one of my 2 machines. The attached patch fixes > it for me. Can you also check? Thanks! Such a WaitFor is nicer than a simple delay. But it's hard to do without being able to reproduce. > All other test pass for me. I don't see the failure > in Test_compiler(). What does "/usr/bin/perl --version" > say on your machine? Mine says: > > $ /usr/bin/perl --version > > This is perl 5, version 26, subversion 1 (v5.26.1) built for > x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi > (with 67 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail) > ...snip... Strangely, the "does not match" text seems to have part of the error repeated. Would work to add a ".*" around "explicit", but that would be weird. -- No letters of the alphabet were harmed in the creation of this message. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202003271841.02RIfZEf014954%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
