Yegappan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 1:59 PM Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yegappan wrote: > > > > > A few minor updates to the help text is below. > > > > > > The Exuberant Ctags is no longer maintained (the last release > > > was in 2009). A maintained version of this is Universal Ctags. > > > I have updated the tagsrch.txt file to include this. > > > > Did anybody compare the two? Exuberant ctags is very fast, it's easy to > > make it slower when adding new features. > > > > > To compare the two, I built the tags file for the Linux kernel source tree > and the results are: > > Exuberant ctags: 1 minute and 1 second (485 MB tags file) > Universal ctags: 44 seconds (657 MB tags file) > > As Universal ctags is based on exuberant ctags, all the command line > options are supported. It also supports a lot more languages. That sounds good. Thanks for checking. -- For humans, honesty is a matter of degree. Engineers are always honest in matters of technology and human relationships. That's why it's a good idea to keep engineers away from customers, romantic interests, and other people who can't handle the truth. (Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202004200802.03K82tSf028643%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
