Hi Bram, On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:10 PM Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> So with this option set you can move through a tree. When going back up a > branch and then down another branch, CTRL-O still takes you further up the > tree. A note in the help would help users understand this. > I have updated the help text to include the above note. > The disadvantage is that branches that were visited before are gone. I > wonder if we could somehow remember them. The big question is what command > would navigate through this? With CTRL-I you would have to pick the branch > to go into. And you need to know where you are. Since jumps are not that > predictable that would be too complex. > > Perhaps we can use something similar to undo: add a timestamp to each > position, so that you can go back and forward in time. That would combine > the behavior with the option on and off, using different commands instead > of setting an option. We would need to remember two jumplists. > It makes sense to have multiple branches in the jump list and allow a user to browse through different branches. But why do we need to associate a timestamp with each jump location? Unlike the undo tree, why would a user need to go back in the jump list based on time? Regards, Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7%3DOPgmxJ7Hi-yF89V%2BnaSie-dSbCU%2BoW-PNvZUumw8NFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
