> On Monday, April 19, 2021 at 9:03:00 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, April 19, 2021 at 7:53:14 AM UTC-4 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > I am building vim without the gui feature on windows 10 using mingw. I 
> >> am 
> >> > seeing many swapfiles left behind when I run the Vim test suite. 
> >> > 
> >> > This is apparently caused by the "echoconsole" command that is in the 
> >> file 
> >> > runtest.vim (the call was introduced in patch 8.2.2638). I believe this 
> >> > causes the problem because if I bracket that command with a test for 
> >> > "gui_running" the swapfiles are cleaned up as they should be and the 
> >> tests 
> >> > succeed. 
> >> > 
> >> > In addition, after echoconsole displays its arguments on stdout, 
> >> vim.exe 
> >> > appears to terminate because I then see the command prompt from 
> >> cmd.exe. I 
> >> > don't see any indication of an error condition from Vim. 
> >> > 
> >> > Adding the if-test prevents the undesired behavior but I'm uncertain if 
> >> > that's the fix you would prefer so I haven't provided a patch and am 
> >> > limiting this note to reporting the problem. 
> >>
> >> Strange, I would not expect writing to the console have any effect on 
> >> swapfiles. Does this mean Vim crashes? If you are using MinGW, perhaps 
> >> you can use gdb to see what happens. 
> >>
> >
> > If vim is crashing I see no evidence of it.  Except for the left-behind 
> > swapfiles, it appears that vim exiting without error.
> >  I will investigate further with gdb as you've suggested. 
> >
> > I neglected to mention that I'm building with the "normal" feature set and 
> > that I see the same behavior if I build with the MSYS2 distribution.
> >
> >
> >> A workaround would be that when not running the GUI make :echoconsole 
> >> behave like :echomsg. In eval.c, ex_execute.c, change: 
> >>
> >> if (eap->cmdidx == CMD_echomsg) 
> >>
> >> into: 
> >>
> >> if (eap->cmdidx == CMD_echomsg || (eap->cmdidx == CMD_echoconsole && 
> >> !gui.in_use)) 
> >>
> >> You may have to add an #ifdef. 
> >>
> >
> > I can't speak to the change you've suggested above but I think it is the 
> > right approach as opposed to just "fixing" the test which is why I did not 
> > propose a patch.  It seems inappropriate to me to have vim-without-gui 
> > printing to stdout.  
>
> Using gdb it turns out that vim is aborting with a segmentation fault.  The 
> traceback is:
> 
>    os_win32.c, line 6414:  s[len] = NUL;
>    ui.c, line 52:  mch_write(s, len);
>    eval.c, line 6161:  ui_write((char_u *)"\r\n", 2, TRUE);
> 
> So it appears that mch_write() is attempting to modify a string literal so 
> I'm guessing that the literal is in read-only memory.  To test this, I 
> created a local variable, initialized it to "]r]n"  and passed this as the 
> first argument.  After rebuilding, the problem no longer occurs.

Thank you for figuring that out!

> So, I propose the following patch (forgive the poor GoogleGroups 
> formatting):
> 
> diff --git a/src/eval.c b/src/eval.c
> index 4dbbc4096..abf9406c9 100644
> --- a/src/eval.c
> +++ b/src/eval.c
> @@ -6157,8 +6157,9 @@ ex_execute(exarg_T *eap)
>         }
>         else if (eap->cmdidx == CMD_echoconsole)
>         {
> +           char_u crlf[] = "\r\n";
>             ui_write(ga.ga_data, (int)STRLEN(ga.ga_data), TRUE);
> -           ui_write((char_u *)"\r\n", 2, TRUE);
> +           ui_write(crlf, 2, TRUE);
>         }
>         else if (eap->cmdidx == CMD_echoerr)
>         {

Not writing the NUL when it's already there should catch more cases.
It's too easy to add another ui_write() with a string literal.  I'll
make a patch that solves it this way, please check.

-- 
Statistics say that you can have a baby per month on average:
Just get nine women pregnant.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///                                                                      \\\
\\\        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202104200837.13K8b0Em789898%40masaka.moolenaar.net.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui