Hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 1:41 PM Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > *** ../vim-8.2.2864/src/userfunc.c 2021-05-18 11:47:31.884191326 +0200 > --- src/userfunc.c 2021-05-18 13:37:35.985264203 +0200 > *************** > *** 4014,4020 **** > // Save the starting line number. > sourcing_lnum_top = SOURCING_LNUM; > > ! if (get_function_body(eap, &newlines, line_arg, &line_to_free) == FAIL) > goto erret; > > /* > --- 4014,4023 ---- > // Save the starting line number. > sourcing_lnum_top = SOURCING_LNUM; > > ! // Do not define the function when getting the body fails and when > ! // skipping. > ! if (get_function_body(eap, &newlines, line_arg, &line_to_free) == FAIL > ! || eap->skip) > goto erret; Reversing this condition (so, re-writing it to if (eap->skip || get_function_body(eap, &newlines, line_arg, &line_to_free) == FAIL ) would make this case faster, and really skip getting the function body. Or do you _need_ to get the function body here in order to go to the correct spot in the script?? Christ van Willegen -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CA%2BOt1OwQUifNRe-aV2yagSrgRtZdVF2-mK9BKfU0yyVmf%2BGdMg%40mail.gmail.com.
