On 2021-11-22, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2021-11-21, daz10000 wrote: > > though to be fair, it looks like it has been treating .fs as forth for a > > while, > > but the changes to the forth definition (more recent but not terribly > > recent) > > pushed it over the edge. The right thing to do probably would be to include > > a > > decent F# definition and determine what you are dealing with and use the > > right > > one. I'm willing to take a bet that the vast majority of the .fs forth > > definition consumers are F# programmers at this point though :( - I > > struggled > > to even find any forth code to see what it looked like. > > I tried to find a change that would explain what you observed, but > I can't. Since Vim 7.0, I found one change to syntax/forth.vim > that [improperly] sets 'iskeyword' and one change to filetype.vim > that adds .fth as a forth file extension.
I found Vim 7.2.330 from November, 2012, in /usr/bin/vim on an old system. Even it set 'filetype' to "forth" and added '.' to 'iskeyword' when I opened foo.fs. I'm not seeing any "recent" changes to Vim's handling of .fs files. Regards, Gary -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/20211122093147.GD12715%40phoenix.
