> > On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 10:09:08 PM UTC+11 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > This is what we would have then: > > > > - Vim9 script at script level: "s:" NOT allowed. > > - Vim9 script in :def function: "s:" NOT allowed. > > - Vim9 script in legacy function: "s:" required for script items. > > - legacy script at script level: "s:" required for script items. > > - legacy script in :def function: "s:" required for script items that > are not defined yet, "s:" optional for existing script items. > > - legacy script in legacy function: "s:" required for script items > > I am not familiar enough with the details to make a meaningful > recommendation. However, the above list mentions "legacy" in the last four > items and it would make sense for s: to be required/optional there. The > first two items (Vim9 script at script level, Vim9 script in :def function) > should not permit s:. > > John >
-- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/3cfe832d-4c44-4e66-b5d4-cc9b04724313n%40googlegroups.com.
