I wrote:
> Patch 8.2.4510 > Problem: Vim9: shortening commands leads to confusing script. > Solution: In Vim9 script require at least ":cont" for ":continue", "const" > instead of "cons", "break" instead of "brea", "catch" instead of > "cat", "else" instead of "el" "elseif" instead of "elsei" "endfor" > instead of "endfo" "endif" instead of "en" "endtry" instead of > "endt", "finally" instead of "fina", "throw" instead of "th", > "while" instead of "wh". > Files: src/ex_cmds.h, src/ex_docmd.c, src/errors.h, src/evalvars.c, > src/vim9compile.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_script.vim After requiring to use ":var" and disallow ":va", to make Vim9 scripts more readable, I was wondering if we should do this for more commands. Especially using "en" instead of "endif" makes a script harder to understand. So why not do it for all the flow commands? Let me know if you think this restriction is too much. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 169. You hire a housekeeper for your home page. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// \\\ \\\ sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/20220305134118.587B41C02C5%40moolenaar.net.
