Not sure if this is a bug or not.
Example:
---------------------------------------------------
fun! s:Foo()
endfun
fun! s:Bar()
endfun
let name_foo = get(function('s:Foo'), 'name')
let name_bar = get(funcref('s:Bar'), 'name')
echo printf('"%s" vs "%s"', name_foo, name_bar)
exe "function " . name_foo
exe "function " . name_bar
---------------------------------------------------
Result:
---------------------------------------------------
"<SNR>116_Foo" vs "<80><fd>R116_Bar"
function <SNR>116_Foo()
endfunction
function <SNR>116_Bar()
endfunction
---------------------------------------------------
When the Funcref is a funcref() instead of function() the
"<SNR>" part is "0x80fd52".
As one can use the the name starting with 0x80 for looking
up by :function, I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature.
It looks like a signature of sorts and can perhaps be used
to reliably distinguish the two from one another?
Best regards,
M
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/Oyz0Zhjv22vHkwgPUjeKEFPwC3neZ0sZtVojOldLO9gRSXXVLpVAaQ-OCGf7KG2RRrpP8TX9W_U0Ws6yaTZ4somJcXzNDKphPIrzLgHXBio%3D%40protonmail.com.
