I wrote:
> > There is a compile-time option to use the old digraphs, instead of
> > "modern" ones. And old means really old, they are from Vim 5.x.
> >
> > I suspect that nobody builds Vim that way. If nobody objects I'll
> > remove the dead code.
>
> No response, thus I'll remove OLD_DIGRAPHS.
>
> Looking into that, I notice there also is HPUX_DIGRAPHS.
> I suspect it is unused.
> So, same question: is anybody using HPUX_DIGRAPHS?
Actually, I do not see any reason to keep HPUX_DIGRAPHS. They don't
make sense to me. Perhaps this was for some strange character set.
Let me remove both. If someone has a problem with this, let's hear it.
--
SECOND SOLDIER: It could be carried by an African swallow!
FIRST SOLDIER: Oh yes! An African swallow maybe ... but not a European
swallow. that's my point.
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// \\\
\\\ sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/20220830135755.6B1021C0374%40moolenaar.net.
