Hi, On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 06:37:24AM -0700, Mike Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I would make a small change to say it is the 'current terminology' but not > the 'proper terminology'. I understand there is work involved in making > these changes to be more inclusive and that it isn't 'free'. > Does anyone else have thoughts on this change?
I have never seen the point in any of these "inclusive" terms. Replacing fitting terms everybody can easily understand with something else which then is named differently in all projects doesn't make the project more inclusive, instead it makes all projects more inaccessible as it requires much more information on what terminology (that once was crystal clear) now is supposed to be used and what given terminology in a given project is supposed to mean. But that seems to be the new normal in today's hypersensitive world. > Thanks, Mike Ciao, Thomas -- Thomas Köhler Email: [email protected] <>< WWW: http://gott-gehabt.de IRC: tkoehler Freenode: thkoehler PGP public key available from Homepage! -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/Yxo239/4MnIM4ofG%40picard.franken.de.
